Lehman Optoelectronics 5050 incident: "Barefoot" PK "wearing shoes"

On the evening of January 17th, due to the recent media reports from the LED industry and the financial media reprinting information on the quality of the company's products, it was mentioned that due to problems with the quality of a company's 5050 LED surface-mounted light-emitting diodes, articles were published on the aforementioned websites and joint Rights Protection, Lehman Optoelectronics issued a clarification announcement that the above report is not true.

The report mentioned that "there are serious problems with Lehman products," and "the eight projects that used the 5050 lamp have been reported by customers as having a bad lamp or a dead lamp." and "Lehman's side has stopped production of the 5050 product. Did not give a few "victims" satisfied answer."

The company stated that the above content is not true. First, the 5050 outdoor SMD product mentioned in the report is only one of the company's packaged products. The product has been sold steadily in recent years and the company has never stopped production. Many foreign customers have specified that Lehman Optoelectronics must use packaged products. The company supplies the customer strictly according to the product quality standard at the time of shipment, and there are reminder notes to prevent the customer from having a large number of dead lights and no bright lights during the subsequent use.

Secondly, the company never shied away from any product quality issues. In the case of clear quality responsibility, it has never evaded or pushed any customer's quality responsibility. As for customer complaints processing, the company has a special system and testing methods, and has a dedicated team responsible for it. In the absence of a clear Lehman product quality issues, the company has been actively dealing with and coordinating with customers. Li Xiang Huike and De Cai Optoelectronics all stated in the report that they had invited experts to analyze and prove the product's accident attribution. However, our company has not yet received the objective proof provided by the above customers to fully prove that the product is responsible for the accident.

For this incident, if a third-party-approved third-party certification report on product quality accidents determines Lehman's responsibility, Lehman will not avoid or shirk. The company will use this as an opportunity to further improve product quality, improve product performance, and do a good job of after-sales service to meet market demand with better products and services.

Lehman Optoelectronics has never had any product quality lawsuits with customers since it was listed; all customer litigations are long-term arrears for some customers (including media coverage of the four companies), and have been repeatedly pressed by relevant agencies. The contract stipulated the payment, and it took only a legal way to retire.

All the above four companies have experienced arrears in the payment status of the company to different extents, of which Lixiang Huike still owes more than 1 million yuan in the company’s purchases. The company’s product claims before the company’s products are still inconclusive, and has submitted high compensation claims. .

LianTeng Technology owed the company more than 1.79 million yuan in 2011 due to its outstanding payment for more than one year. The company had no choice but to file a lawsuit against the company. After the court mediation, the company’s loan claims were supported by the court. However, in line with the principle of safeguarding customer relationships, the company reduced the amount of Lianyun Technology’s receivables and agreed to perform it in four phases. However, it has so far failed to fully repay the arrears on time, and the court still freezes its value by nearly 2 million. Yuan's machinery and equipment.

To sum up, the four companies that issued joint declarations of rights rights have seriously jeopardized the company's reputation before the responsibilities were clearly defined.